Showing posts with label XI. Show all posts
Showing posts with label XI. Show all posts

Sunday, February 8, 2026

The Rocking-horse Winner - Explanation - Summary - Q&A - Solved

Class XI English Elective · Woven Words · Short story study guide

About this guide: This study resource explores D. H. Lawrence’s short story The Rocking-horse Winner through a clear summary, character analysis, themes, textbook-style questions, vocabulary and practice questions. Paul’s behaviour is discussed through the story’s language and events; no unsupported clinical diagnosis is applied to him.

1. About the Author

D. H. Lawrence (1885–1930) was an English novelist, short-story writer, poet and essayist. His writing often examines emotional relationships, social pressures and the tensions between instinct and convention. The Rocking-horse Winner uses a strange, almost fairy-tale-like situation to explore money anxiety and the emotional needs of a child.

2. Summary of “The Rocking-horse Winner”

The story centres on a family that appears comfortable but is haunted by the feeling that it needs more money. Paul’s mother, Hester, is attractive and socially ambitious, yet she feels unlucky and dissatisfied. She believes that luck is what enables people to become rich and regards Paul’s father as unlucky. The children sense that something is wrong in the household, while the repeated whisper “There must be more money” seems to fill the house.

Paul wants his mother to be happy and hopes to prove that he is lucky. He discovers that when he rides his rocking-horse with great intensity, he eventually feels certain about the name of a winning racehorse. He shares his predictions with Bassett, the family’s gardener, who places bets. Paul’s Uncle Oscar later becomes involved as well.

Paul’s winnings are used to arrange a large sum of money for his mother, including annual birthday gifts. Yet the money does not end the household’s anxiety. The whispering seems to grow stronger, and Paul becomes increasingly determined to discover the next winner. His riding grows more intense, and his health deteriorates.

As the Derby approaches, Paul becomes consumed by the need to identify the winning horse. In a feverish final effort, he names Malabar. Malabar wins, and Paul’s prediction brings a huge sum of money. However, Paul collapses and becomes gravely ill. Before he dies, he insists that he is lucky. His family has gained money, but the victory is overshadowed by the loss of the child who tried so desperately to secure his mother’s affection.

The ending is tragic and ironic: Paul succeeds in the financial task he has set himself, but the success cannot restore his health or resolve the emotional emptiness at the centre of the family.

3. Explanation and Analysis

The whispering house

The repeated thought that “there must be more money” is more than a literal sound. It makes the family’s financial anxiety feel like a presence in the home. The house becomes a symbol of a desire that is never satisfied, even when money arrives.

Paul’s search for luck

Paul interprets his mother’s comments as a problem he must solve. He connects luck with money and money with the hope of being loved. His determination begins as a child’s wish to help, but it turns into an obsession that harms him.

Money without peace

Paul’s gifts do not make Hester content. The family’s material position improves, but the emotional problem remains. Lawrence questions a culture in which wealth becomes a measure of success and a substitute for affection.

The tragic ending

The final race gives Paul the result he wants, but it comes at a terrible cost. The irony lies in the gap between financial triumph and personal disaster. The story does not present his death as a successful way to earn love; rather, it exposes the damage caused when a child assumes responsibility for adult dissatisfaction.

4. Character Sketches

Paul

Paul is sensitive to the tension in his home and longs for his mother’s affection. He believes that becoming lucky and earning money will make her happy. His determination develops into an increasingly consuming pursuit that damages his health. His tragedy lies in taking on a burden that should never have been his responsibility.

Hester, Paul’s mother

Hester is attractive and socially conscious, but dissatisfied with her life and emotionally distant from her children. She associates luck with financial success and remains uneasy despite receiving money. She does show concern when Paul’s health declines, which makes her character more complex than a simple caricature of greed.

Bassett

Bassett, the gardener and a former soldier who served Uncle Oscar, takes Paul’s predictions seriously and helps place bets. He becomes a trusted adult in Paul’s secret undertaking, though his participation also enables the boy’s dangerous obsession to continue.

Uncle Oscar

Oscar Creswell is intrigued by Paul’s apparent ability to predict winners and joins the betting arrangement. He is more responsive to Paul’s unusual success than the adults who might otherwise protect him from its consequences.

5. Themes and Symbols

Theme or symbolMeaning and significance
MaterialismThe family’s desire for money continues even when its financial situation improves.
Luck and successHester treats luck as the key to wealth; Paul adopts this belief and tries to prove his worth through winnings.
Emotional neglectPaul’s longing for affection helps explain why he takes on the task of making his mother happy.
The whispering houseIt represents the family’s persistent anxiety and the demand for more money.
The rocking-horseA toy associated with childhood becomes an instrument of intense effort and obsession. Its movement does not take Paul anywhere physically, yet he believes it can lead him to the winner.
IronyPaul’s greatest prediction succeeds, but the victory coincides with his collapse and death.

6. Expressions and Vocabulary

ExpressionMeaning in context
“There must be more money!”The family’s continuing dissatisfaction and financial anxiety.
“The house came to be haunted by the unspoken phrase.”The desire for money dominates the household even when no one says it aloud.
“She married for love, and the love turned to dust.”The affection that once sustained the marriage has faded.
“Seeking for luck”Paul tries to discover a way to become lucky and win money.
“He’s sure to know.”Paul believes that his intense rocking will reveal the winning horse.
“I am lucky!”Paul’s final insistence that he has achieved the identity he was striving for.
“The voices in the house suddenly went mad.”The family’s desire for money appears to intensify beyond control.
“She felt the centre of her heart go hard.”An image of emotional coldness or the hardening of feeling.
“Malabar”The name of the horse Paul identifies for the final race; it marks his final prediction.
“He’s best gone out of a life where he rides his rocking-horse to find a winner.”Uncle Oscar’s bleak reflection on the burden Paul has carried and the tragic cost of his pursuit.

Useful vocabulary: dissatisfied — not content; obsession — an idea or activity that dominates attention; materialism — placing excessive importance on money and possessions; irony — a contrast between expectation and outcome; symbol — an object or image that conveys a wider meaning.

7. Understanding the Text — Questions and Answers

Q1. What was the reason for young Paul’s restlessness at the beginning of the story? How did it find expression?

Answer: Paul senses his mother’s dissatisfaction and hears that the family is unlucky because it lacks money. He believes that luck brings wealth and hopes that becoming lucky will make his mother happy. His restlessness finds expression in his intense riding of the rocking-horse, through which he believes he can identify winning racehorses.

Q2. Why do you think Paul’s mother was not satisfied with the yearly birthday gift of £1,000 for five years?

Answer: Hester’s dissatisfaction goes beyond a simple shortage of money. She wants a lifestyle and social position that seem to require ever more wealth. The gifts improve the family’s finances, but they do not change her underlying sense of being unlucky or satisfy her desire for more. The house’s continuing whisper symbolises this endless demand.

Q3. What was the reason for the anxiety of Paul’s mother as he grew older?

Answer: Hester becomes anxious because Paul’s interest in horse racing grows into an intense preoccupation. He rides for long periods, becomes increasingly agitated and eventually appears seriously unwell. She worries about his condition and considers sending him away to school. Her concern grows, although she does not fully understand the pressure that has driven him.

Q4. Paul’s final bet made the family richer but cost him his life. Explain.

Answer: Paul wants to prove that he is lucky and hopes that winning money will bring his mother happiness and affection. With Bassett and later Uncle Oscar, he places bets based on the names he believes he discovers while riding his rocking-horse. His final intense effort identifies Malabar as the Derby winner. The horse wins, but Paul collapses from the strain and dies. The family gains money, yet the victory is inseparable from a devastating personal loss.

8. Talking about the Text — Discussion Answers

Q1. “Luck is necessary for success in life.” Discuss.

Answer: People often attribute success to luck, but achievement usually depends on a combination of preparation, judgement, effort and circumstances. Luck may influence an outcome, yet relying on it alone can be dangerous. In Lawrence’s story, the belief that luck guarantees wealth drives Paul to take extreme risks. The story invites readers to question whether financial success can provide genuine happiness when emotional needs are neglected.

Q2. Although Paul’s mother liked to be rich, she did not approve of betting on horses. Explain.

Answer: Hester desires wealth and the comforts associated with it, but she recognises that gambling can bring financial and personal ruin. Her objection to betting does not remove the contradiction in her values: she wants more money while disapproving of the risky method through which Paul obtains it. This conflict highlights the distance between her material desires and the consequences of satisfying them.

Q3. What were the voices that Paul heard? Did they lead him to success in the real sense?

Answer: The voices are the repeated, unspoken demand for more money that seems to fill the house. They can be read as a literary representation of the family’s financial anxiety and material dissatisfaction. Paul does win money, but the winnings do not bring lasting peace or repair his relationship with his mother. In a deeper sense, therefore, the voices do not lead to success: they intensify the pressure that contributes to his tragedy.

9. Appreciation — Questions and Answers

Q1. Examine the communication channels in the story between the following characters.

Answer:

a. Paul and his mother: Their relationship is marked by emotional distance. They are highly aware of each other’s feelings, but affection is not openly expressed in a reassuring way. Paul interprets his mother’s dissatisfaction as a problem he must solve.

b. Paul and Bassett: Their communication is based on trust and secrecy. Paul shares his predictions with Bassett, who helps place bets and takes the boy seriously. This closeness supports Paul, but it also allows the betting to continue.

c. Paul and Uncle Oscar: Oscar is curious about Paul’s unusual predictions and becomes involved in the betting. Their relationship combines affection and adult fascination with the boy’s apparent success, rather than providing a firm boundary to protect him.

d. Bassett and Uncle Oscar: They communicate through their shared involvement in horse racing and their knowledge of Paul’s predictions. Once Oscar learns of the arrangement, the three become partners in the betting.

e. Paul’s mother and Uncle Oscar: As brother and sister, they share family concerns, but they do not see Paul’s activities in the same way. Oscar knows about the betting, while Hester’s desire for wealth conflicts with her concern about the risks associated with gambling.

Q2. How has the author linked the symbol of the rocking-horse to Paul’s triumphs at the races?

Answer: The rocking-horse is a toy that moves back and forth without travelling anywhere. For Paul, however, riding it with growing intensity seems to take him to a state in which he becomes certain of a winning horse’s name. The contrast between the toy’s physical stillness and Paul’s belief in its power makes it a symbol of his obsessive search for control. It links his apparent triumphs to the pressure he places on himself to earn money and prove that he is lucky.

Q3. The ending is an instance of irony. Suppose Paul had not died at the end; how would you have reacted to the story?

Answer: If Paul had survived, the story would have been less tragic, but its central conflict would remain. His survival might allow him to recover and question the belief that he must earn money to deserve affection. The actual ending is more unsettling because Paul achieves the winning prediction but loses his life. This contrast exposes the cost of turning a child’s need for love into a financial mission.

10. Language Work

Q1. “A bird in hand is worth two in the bush.” Explain the proverb literally and in the context of the story.

Answer: Literal meaning: A bird already caught is more certain than two birds one hopes to catch later. The proverb advises people to value what they have rather than risk it for something uncertain.

In the context of the story: The proverb can be related to the contrast between secure resources and the uncertain hope of winning more through betting. Paul’s family continues to desire additional money despite receiving substantial sums, illustrating the danger of risking present well-being in pursuit of greater wealth.

Q2. Explain “sure as eggs”, “spinning yarns” and “turned to dust”. Use each in a sentence.

Answer:

  • Sure as eggs: absolutely certain. Sentence: She was sure as eggs that the train would arrive on time.
  • Spinning yarns: telling stories, often exaggerated or invented. Sentence: The old sailor spent the evening spinning yarns about his travels.
  • Turned to dust: came to nothing or lost its value. Sentence: Their hopes of an easy victory turned to dust after the final round.

Q3. Explain the facial-expression words: smile, grin, grimace and sneer.

Answer:

  • Smile: an expression in which the corners of the mouth turn up, often showing pleasure or friendliness.
  • Grin: a broad smile, sometimes showing the teeth.
  • Grimace: a contorted facial expression showing pain, disgust or discomfort.
  • Sneer: a scornful or mocking expression.

Note: These Language Work answers are study aids based on the expressions associated with the chapter. Check the exact wording and order against the edition of Woven Words used in your class.

11. Additional Exam Questions with Model Answers

Q1. What role does luck play in the story?

Answer: Luck is the idea through which Hester explains wealth and through which Paul tries to earn his mother’s approval. Paul’s apparent ability to predict winning horses makes luck seem powerful, but the results do not bring emotional fulfilment. Lawrence shows the danger of allowing luck and money to become measures of personal worth.

Q2. How does Paul try to gain his mother’s love, and is he successful?

Answer: Paul believes that becoming lucky and providing money will make his mother happy and win her affection. He secretly arranges large gifts for her and continues betting when the household’s desire for money persists. Although Hester becomes concerned about his health, the money does not resolve their emotional distance. His efforts bring financial gains but end in tragedy.

Q3. What does the whispering of the house symbolise?

Answer: The whispering symbolises the persistent desire for more money that governs the household. It makes financial anxiety seem almost alive and inescapable. Even after Paul’s winnings improve the family’s position, the whisper does not stop, suggesting that material desire can continue to grow without producing contentment.

Q4. How does Paul’s relationship with Uncle Oscar differ from his relationship with his mother?

Answer: Paul’s relationship with Uncle Oscar is more open about the horse-racing predictions, and Oscar becomes a partner in the betting. With his mother, Paul hides his method and hopes that the money will earn her love. Oscar’s involvement gives Paul’s project adult approval, while his relationship with Hester remains shaped by emotional distance and unspoken expectations.

Q5. Why is the ending ironic?

Answer: Paul finally identifies the winning horse in the Derby and secures a large financial victory for his family. Yet he collapses and dies immediately after achieving the goal he has pursued. The family gains wealth but loses Paul, so the success becomes inseparable from tragedy. The ending challenges the assumption that money or luck can guarantee happiness.

Q6. How does Lawrence use the rocking-horse as a symbol?

Answer: The rocking-horse represents Paul’s attempt to control uncertain events and solve an adult problem through a child’s effort. Its repetitive motion suggests a cycle that never truly progresses. The harder Paul rides, the more consumed he becomes by the search for a winning name, making the toy a symbol of obsession and the destructive pursuit of luck.

Q7. Is Hester simply a greedy character?

Answer: Hester is dissatisfied and strongly drawn to wealth and social comfort, but she is not presented only through greed. She is emotionally distant from her children and fails to recognise the full pressure Paul carries, yet she becomes anxious when his health declines. This tension makes her character more complex and strengthens the story’s criticism of material values and emotional neglect.

Q8. What is the significance of Paul’s final declaration, “I am lucky”?

Answer: The declaration reveals how completely Paul has accepted his mother’s idea that luck is linked to money and worth. He believes that identifying the winner proves he has succeeded, even as his health fails. The words are tragic because the victory he celebrates cannot give him a future or repair the emotional relationship that motivated his actions.

Q9. How does the story portray childhood innocence?

Answer: Paul begins with a child’s desire to help his mother and make the family happy. However, he takes on adult worries about money and social status. His innocence is gradually overtaken by the pressure to win, showing the harm caused when children feel responsible for solving problems created by adults.

Q10. Does Paul achieve success in the real sense?

Answer: In financial terms, Paul succeeds because his predictions bring the family a large sum of money. In human terms, his success is hollow: he loses his health and life, and the deeper emotional problem remains unresolved. The story distinguishes winning money from achieving well-being, security and affection.

12. Interactive Quiz

Choose one answer for each question, then select Check answers to see your score and explanations.

1. What does the whispering house mainly represent?
2. Why does Paul ride the rocking-horse so intensely?
3. What motivates Paul most deeply?
4. Who first helps Paul with the betting?
5. What does the rocking-horse chiefly symbolise?
6. Why do Paul's gifts fail to quiet the house?
7. Which horse does Paul identify for the Derby?
8. What makes the ending ironic?
9. Which description of Hester is most balanced?
10. What central idea does the story convey?

13. Quick Revision Guide

  • Central conflict: Paul tries to satisfy his mother’s desire for money and win her affection.
  • Paul’s belief: luck leads to wealth, and wealth may bring love.
  • Key symbols: the whispering house and the rocking-horse.
  • Important characters: Paul, Hester, Bassett and Uncle Oscar.
  • Climax: Paul predicts Malabar for the Derby and wins, but collapses and dies.
  • Irony: the family gains money at the cost of losing Paul.
  • Interpretative caution: describe Paul's observable behaviour and the story's symbolism; do not assign him a clinical diagnosis unsupported by the text.
Teacher Insight: For an analytical answer, make a clear point, refer to a specific event or image in the story, and explain how it supports your interpretation. Avoid simply retelling the plot or diagnosing a character. A strong answer distinguishes what the text states from what a reader infers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main theme of “The Rocking-horse Winner”?

The destructive effects of materialism and emotional neglect, especially when a child feels responsible for satisfying adult desires.

Why does Paul ride the rocking-horse?

He believes that intense riding helps him discover which horse will win a race and therefore become lucky.

Why is the ending tragic and ironic?

Paul’s final prediction wins a large sum for the family, but the effort is followed by his death. The financial triumph becomes a personal catastrophe.

Does the story diagnose Paul with a psychological disorder?

No. The story portrays his intense preoccupation, agitation and physical decline, but it does not provide a clinical diagnosis. Literary analysis should remain grounded in those details.

Friday, October 5, 2018

Coming by Philip Larkin Class XI Elective English - Woven Words Ch-03



Coming
by Philip Larkin

On longer evenings,
Light, chill and yellow,
Bathes the serene
Foreheads of houses.
A thrush sings,
Laurel-surrounded
In the deep bare garden,
Its fresh-peeled voice
Astonishing the brickwork.
It will be spring soon,
It will be spring soon—
And I, whose childhood
Is a forgotten boredom,
Feel like a child
Who comes on a scene
Of adult reconciling,
And can understand nothing
But the unusual laughter,
And starts to be happy. 


UNDERSTANDING THE POEM

  1. What does the bird in the poem announce? How is this related to the title, ‘Coming’?

    ANSWER:
    The poem 'Coming' by Philip Larkin is a celebration of the advent of the spring. To express the happiness the poet sets the plot of house fronts bathed in chilly and yellow light. Amidst all this, a thrush sings a welcoming song. It seems the whole nature is dancing with joy at the arrival of the new season. The thrush, sitting in a garden shrub, laurel”, in the deep bare garden, is humming repeatedly in” its fresh-peeled voice “that” it will be spring soon”. This joyful singing of the thrush imparts an “astonishing” effect on the brickwork of the houses. The poet feels happy as well to see the beauty that nature encompasses. In fact it is through the voice of the thrush that the poet has tried to express that how overwhelmed he is on the “coming” of the spring.
  2. Why is the speaker’s childhood described as ‘a forgotten boredom’?

    ANSWER:
    The autobiographical element makes a reader curious to know about Larkin's childhood. His parents were very loving and affectionate. However, he recalls his childhood as a dejected one. He talks of himself in depreciating terms. It appears that the poet had a very poor concept of himself. It is also known that Philip suffered slight stammer in childhood that endured for the rest of his life, though reduced. If the reader pays attention, argues John Woley, it is not difficult to note the contradiction in the term “forgotten boredom”. If, like Larkin says, he has forgotten his childhood, the question is, how can he comment so confidently that it was a bored one? However, it may be concluded that Larkin's childhood did not have any memories that he was fond of.He even remarked once that his biography could begin when he was 21, which implies that nothing spectacular happened before that. Thus, Philip Larkin recalls his childhood as “a forgotten boredom”.
  3. What causes the element of surprise when the child comes on the scene of ‘adult reconciling’?

    ANSWER:
    As Larkin is absorbed in the resonant humming of the thrush, he transcends present to his boring childhood, which he feels is best forgotten. The poet is transformed into a child. He feels happy like a child who feels happy just by watching elders reconciling with each other. The child comprehends nothing yet smiles just because the adults are happy. This might appear surprising however, if one may look more closely, the scene reflects the innocence of a child. Probably the poet has tried to make a point that our happiness lies in other's happiness. The whole thought makes Larkin happy and he wonders about the mystiques of universe and human life.
  4. What two things are compared in the poem?

    ANSWER:
    It is difficult to judge whether the poet is trying to compare or is drawing a relation. Philip Larkin, in his poem Coming, celebrates the advent of the new season, spring, with the “fresh-peeled voice” of the thrush. He creates the imagery of the spring peeled out of the winter. The old season giving birth to the new season. The nature had been sleeping in the cold and gloomy winter and now the freshness of the new season sparked a new life in it. The birds, houses, gardens, the whole nature has joined the party to welcome the spring. Seeing this transformation the poet is so happy that he himself transcends into childhood.

    Here Larkin highlights the difference between innocence and experience. He presents an innocent watching the adults, laughing and reconciling, probably after a fight or reconciling with the life. How he begins to feel happy though he understands nothing. This is the innocence of the child that his happiness lies in others happiness, which is juxtaposed with the experienced adults, who engage themselves in trivial issues creating troubles for themselves and others.

    The poet has tried to bring out the difference between two seasons and stages of human life. This mystique is beyond Larkin's comprehension and he is only left wondering about it all.
  5. How do you respond to these lines?
    Light, chill and yellow,
    Bathes the serene
    Foreheads of houses


    ANSWER:
    The poem Coming by Philip Larkin is dedicated to the beauty the spring brings along with it. It is a celebration of humanity. In the beginning, the poet creates a picturesque in the mind of a reader. Larkin creates a beautiful evening scenery. The longer evenings of the spring are jeweled by the forehead of calm houses' roof tops, washed down by the chilly and yellow light of the setting sun. The reader is imparted with beautiful imagery of the whole environment sitting serenely and enjoying the sun going down as the spring beckons. They all dance to the humming of the thrush in the deep garden. It feels like the whole nature has come alive in the lovely evening and join the party to welcome the coming of the spring.
  6. Comment on the use of the phrase ‘fresh-peeled voice’.

    ANSWER:
    Larkin uses the “fresh-peeled voice” of the thrush as an adjective to beautify the evening setting of the new season, the spring. The phrase describes the freshness and sharpness of the thrush's humming. This freshness is symbolic of the freshness that has dissolved in the air with the advent of the new season that the poet celebrates. The thrush sings, sitting in a “laurel-surrounded in the deep bare garden”. It hums repeatedly that “it will be spring soon”. Its singing marks an “astonishing” effect on the brickwork of the houses. The song of the thrush also acts a catalyst in the transcending of Philip to his childhood flashing the “forgotten-boredom” right in front of his eyes. He is transformed into a child. The poet probably tries to draw a parallelism between the freshness of the bird's song and the innocence of the child. The “fresh-peeled voice” is symbolic of the spring succeeding the winter. The transformation of the season. It appears as the winter gave birth to the spring and now that it is coming, the whole universe and humanity dance to the tune of thrush to join in the celebration.


Thursday, February 12, 2015

Class XI - Elective English - 6. The Third and Final Continent - Jhumpa Lahiri

Class XI - Elective English - 6. The Third and Final Continent - Jhumpa Lahiri

APPRECIATION

  1. Discuss the manner in which the author interweaves details of the narrator’s family with the flow of the main narrative.

    The details about the narrator's family is important for the readers in order to understand the psyche of the narrator. He had a very turbulent childhood and was brought up among very disturbed conditions at home. This is important for us to understand the bond he shared with Mrs. Croft. The words written by the author expresses that he was very attached to his mother and had fulfilled the role of an eldest son till the time she was cremated. He missed his mother a lot and recollected small incidents about she never forgetting to drape her head before coming in front of his father. When he came to know of Mrs. Croft's age which had crossed a century, he contemplated on how his mother couldn't adjust to his father's death and turned insane. Her insanity led to deterioration of her health. Her death gave him a heavy blow but he cared for her till the very last moment before cremating her. This shows his reason for growth of empathy towards Mrs. Croft because of her old age. Thus, his concern for Mrs. Croft grew which can be clearly reflected in the line: I was mortified. I had assumed Mrs. Croft was in her eighties...that this person was a widow who lived alone mortified me further still.

  2. ‘Mrs Croft’s was the first death I mourned in America, for, hers was the first life I had admired; she had left this world at last,ancient and alone, never to return’—how do these lines encapsulate the bond that is possible between two strangers?

    A person usually feels very detached from people staying around him  abroad. Here is where originates the feeling of diaspora. The same happened with the narrator. He was away from his home and his family and, thus, never grew any feeling of affection towards anybody in America. He was quite alienated with the people of America. However, the course of action justifies his attachment and the emotional bonding which grew between him and Mrs Croft. In the foreign land, he grew a fondness towards the old lady because of various reasons. When he got to know that she was older than a century, he felt a sense of responsibility towards her. He was amazed and was quite awestruck at the idea of a widow of that age residing all alone, with nobody to take care of her . Taking up chores like heating her soup every evening or giving her eight dollars in the envelope every month satisfied him. All these instances and many more cite the fact that a very strong bond had developed between the lady and the narrator.
  3. Examine the pieces of conversation in the story. How do they reflect the worldview of each of the speakers? The various conversations taking place in bits and pieces during the course of action of the story reflect a lot about people's perception on various issues and attitude towards each other and humanity in general. We see a very firm and hypocritical attitude prevalent in the tone of Mrs Croft when the narrator arrived at her place for the first time. This is when for the first time he realised that belonging to a very high standard place was important, anywhere such as Tech or Harvard. The greatness and biasness of Americans to be the first one to step on the moon, considering it an unattainable and impossibly splendid feat to be attained. However, she becomes mild for the first time when she receives the eight dollars from the narrator. Mrs Croft's orthodox ways become prominently visible when she objects to a lady and a man talking in private without a chaperone. Her conventional ways are quite evident keeping in mind the fact that she had already crossed hundred. The ways of the western world is shown to be in a very high contrast when we see Mrs Croft's daughter Helen being quite indifferent towards her mother's health or meals. Her casual tone when she says “she might have slipped” might disturb readers. However, even with the differences in opinions, perceptions and norms, the bond which had developed between the narrator and an American widow of a hundred years is worth appreciation.

Wednesday, December 10, 2014

Essay-04 Tribal Verse by G.N. Devy


Class Notes - English - XI - Electictive - Woven Words - Essays:04

UNDERSTANDING THE TEXT

  1. Identify the common characteristics shared by tribal communities all over the world.

    The essayist identifies some common characteristics shared by tribal communities all over the world. The tribals live in groups that are cohesive and organically unified. They show very little interest in accumulating wealth or in using labour as a device to gather interest and capital. The tribals accept a world view in which nature, human beings and God are intimately linked and they believe in the human ability to spell and interpret truth. They live more by intuition than reason, they consider the space around them more sacred than secular, and their sense of time is personal rather than objective.
  2. What distinguishes the tribal imagination from the secular imagination?

    The tribal imagination is, according to the author, dreamlike and hallucinatory. It admits fusion between various planes of existence and levels of time in a natural way. These characteristics distinguish the tribal imagination from the secular imagination. In tribal stories, oceans fly in the sky as birds, mountains swim in the water as fish, animals speak as humans and stars grow like plants. In tribal imagination, stars, seas, mountains, trees, men and animals, can be angry, sad or happy.
  3. How does G.N. Devy bring out the importance of the oral literary tradition?

    G. N. Devy brings out the importance of the oral literary tradition by referring to the richness of the works of the tribals that have been handed down from one generation to the other orally. He tries to bring home the point that though the literary compositions have been transmitted orally yet thematically and ornamentally they are very rich. The stories and songs that have come down to the tribals through oral tradition are unique. These compositions present the exclusive world view of the tribals. He points out that the wealth and variety of these works is very enormous. In order to show the importance of the oral literary tradition, Devy throws light on the various characteristics of the tribal arts. He shows that one of the main characteristics of tribal arts is their distinct manner of constructing space and imagery, which might be described as hallucinatory. Playfulness is another dimension of this tradition. Devy advocates that proper recognition should be given to the oral literary tradition in view of its variety and richness.
  4. List the distinctive features of the tribal arts.

    According to the essayist G. N. Devy, the tribal arts display many distinctive features.

    One of the distinctive features of tribal arts is their distinct manner of constructing space and imagery, which might be described as 'hallucinatory'. In both oral and visual forms of representation, tribal artists seem to interpret verbal or pictorial space as demarcated by an extremely flexible 'frame'. The boundaries between art and non art become almost invisible. In a tribal Ramayana, an episode from the Mahabharata makes a sudden and surprising appearance; tribal paintings contain a curious mixture of traditional and modern imagery.

    The tribal arts follow strict convention. Every tribal performance and creation has, at its back, another such performance or creation belonging to a previous occasion. The creativity of the tribal artist lies in adhering to the past while, at the same time, slightly subverting it.

    Playfulness is the soul of tribal arts. The tribal arts rarely assume a serious or pretentious tone. The tribal arts are relaxed and never tense.

    The tribal oral stories and songs employ bilingualism in a complex manner.
  5. ‘New literature’ is a misnomer for the wealth of the Indian literary tradition. How does G.N. Devy explain this?

    According to the essayist, the tribal Literature should not be called 'New Literature' as this has been in existence for many years. The songs and stories of the tribals have been transmitted orally and as these have not been written down so many people have been unaware of them. The essayist contradicts the views of the western literary critics who have termed tribal literature as 'New Literature'. He says that there is nothing new in this, what might be new is the present attempt to see imaginative expression in tribal language not as folklore but as literature and to hear tribal speech not as a dialect but as a language.

Thursday, December 4, 2014

Chapter 04-The Adventure of the Three Garridebs - Arthur Conan Doyle

Class Notes - English - XI - Elective - Woven Words - Chapter:04

UNDERSTANDING THE TEXT

  1. What clues did Sherlock Holmes work upon to get at the fact that the story of the three Garridebs was a ruse?

    The Adventures of Three Garridebs
    Sherlock Holmes noticed that the gentleman who was paying visit to him and his friend Watson under the name of John Garrideb was not what he purported to be because there were discrepancies in his statements as well as appearance. John Garrideb’s claim that he was new to London was not true because the dress that he was wearing was British and that too a worn out one. John’s accent also hinted that he was staying in London for quite some time. Moreover John’s story about Alexander Hamilton Garrideb of Chicago fell flat when he claimed that he knew Dr. Lysander Starr of Topeka very well, a bait cleverly placed by Holmes. Sherlock Holmes also noticed that the advertisement shown to him by John Garrideb apparently placed by Howard Garrideb contained words which were mainly used in USA, proving that it was none other than John Garrideb himself who placed the advertisement. 

    All the above mentioned discrepancies proved that the story of three Garridebs was a ruse.
  2. What was John Garrideb’s objective in inventing the story of Alexander Hamilton Garrideb and his legacy?

    John Garrideb's objective was to gain entry into the house of Nathan Garrideb. He wanted to enter the house because before Nathan Garrideb the house was rented to Presbury, the American criminal, who was running a racket of counterfeit British notes and currencies in a secret  basement in the house of Nathan Garrideb. John and Presbury being friends back then worked in tandem and knew about each others' secrets. When John shot Presbury dead he wanted to lay his hands on the counterfeit notes printing machine and currencies lying hidden in the basement of the house where Nathan Garrideb lived. But Nathan Garrideb proved a hindrance in his planning for he hardly left his dwellings. This led John Garrideb to invent the story of Hamilton Garrideb and his legacy. Nathan Garrideb almost fell in the trap except the fact that he got over enthusiastic and involved Holmes in the hunt of the third Garrideb.
  3. Why didn't John Garrideb like the idea of including Holmes in the hunt for the third Garrideb?

    John Garrideb didn't like the idea of including Holmes in the hunt for the third Garrideb because he feared that his fictitious story of three Garridebs might get busted. His worst fears came true at the end, because Holmes noticed all the discrepancies in his statements and pinned down John Garrideb while he was entering the basement of Nathan Garrideb's house to take away the counterfeit currencies.
  4. Who was Roger Presbury and how was John Garrideb connected with him?

    Roger Presbury was an American criminal who was living in Britain and was involved in counterfeit currency business. He was shot by John Garrideb over cards in a night club on the Waterloo Road in January, 1895. Sherlock found out that his appearance matched with the appearance of Waldron, the previous tenant of the lodging in which now Nathan Garrideb lived. Presbury aka Waldron had hidden a note printing press in his basement and John Garrideb knew about it. It was this printing press that John Garrideb was after and carved out the whole plan to acquire it.
  5. How did Holmes guess that John Garrideb would go to 136, Little Ryder Street? Did he expect to find what he ultimately did before he went there?

    Once it became clear to Holmes that John Garrideb wants to send Nathan Garrideb away for a while, he sensed that there must be something at 136, Little Ryder Street that was of immense importance to John, Holmes expected John Garrideb to show up.Meanwhile Holmes and his friend Watson ensured that John did not suspect that they have any inkling of his plans of sending Nathan Garrideb away. Holmes and Watson did put the man at ease by clearing it to him that they were least interested in any matter and won his confidence by showing that they were just to help him in discovering another Garrideb. Expecting John they arrived and hid themselves in the house at 136, Little Ryder Street and did catch John Garrideb..

APPRECIATION

  1. Examine the structure of the short story ‘Adventure of the Three Garridebs’ with the help of this framework
  • The narrator of the story
  • Introduction of the topic of the story
  • Introduction of the main characters in the plot
  • Development of the plot
  • Climax
  • Resolution of the mystery.

The introduction of the story: The story opens with a faint reflection of the climax. Watson, the narrator, does not give the climax entirely. However, he does tell the reader how the experience will be in the end.
Introduction of the topic of the story: The narrator does not hit the nail on the head, he rather lets the reader explore the story as the situation unfolds itself. However, Watson does not make the reader wait for too long.

Introduction of the main characters in the plot: Watson, the narrator takes the hold of the narration in the very beginning introducing the reader to the story. However we get to know him only once he introduces the reader to him. And it is when Holmes addresses Watson, we come to know the name of the narrator. For it is a first person narrative, we have to wait and move as the narrator describes all the events.

Development of the plot: In the beginning, Holmes is talking about a person with a particular surname and that there is a need to find a person with the surname. Then he tells Watson to wait for the person who has assigned the task to the detective as Holmes wants the person in question himself to explain the situation to his friend. Then arrives, John Garrideb of Kansas, who explains the reason for why is there a need of another surname. And it is made clear for why Nathan approached Holmes for the task as it was John who approached Nathan for the same reason. And then further the story unfolds and with it is the truth explored.

Climax: The climax is built as the series of events are described. There are clues laid for the reader to guess, yet the narrator does not give away the resolution. The reader guesses the possibilities. Ultimately a stage comes where the story reaches its height when Holmes is sure of the identity of the suspect and is sure of evil intentions and yet his motives are not clear. It is all to be discovered by the reader as he/she advances to the final tragedy.

Resolution of the mystery: The resolution unleashes a comical tragedy. The reader is surprised and feels funny as well, thanks to the witty detective that leads the case. A faint reflection of the emotions that the reader might go in the ending were already given in the beginning, yet the resolution was unknown. It is not just the tragedy revealed but along with it is revealed the other side of the main character Sherlock Holmes and his friendship with Dr. Watson. There is more than expected revealed. The digressions of Holmes are justified in the end as well. It was a mystery resolved in the end.

  1. Examine the subtle humour in the narration of the story that lightens the gravity of the subject matter.

    The story's wittiest character is the detective Sherlock Holmes whose digressions are most funny. How in the middle of a sensitive interrogation he points out to the suspect that he appears to be a English, though the suspect exclaims that he is an American. In the beginning when Holmes is explaining the case to Watson, he remarks that there is a chance to make money with this case as if it is they and not the Garridebs who will be given the inheritance of Alexander Garrideb. The most interesting part is the style with which Holmes talks or discusses any information. Even while explaining a serious matter he adapts a casual style. For example, again while in the beginning Holmes is explaining the case to Watson, he did not give away the people already involved in the case. However, he tells that Nathan is already taken in as Watson comes across his name in the directory. He did not even tell the name of the mastermind John Garrideb until Mrs. Hudson approached with the card signed by Garrideb. There are many such instances that make the mystery light-hearted and the reader is not burned by it.
⇧