The Adventure by Jayant Narlikar
A Complete Study Guide for CBSE Class 11 Students
Need quick, exam‑ready solutions? “The Adventure” by Jayant Narlikar links alternate history with science. Professor Gaitonde slips into a parallel India where the Marathas win Panipat, and Rajendra explains it using catastrophe theory and quantum ideas. Below you’ll find crisp summary, NCERT answers, important questions, and 15 MCQs with explanations—perfect for Class 11 revision.
Summary of "The Adventure"
The Mysterious Journey Begins
Professor Gangadharpant Gaitonde, a respected historian from Pune, finds himself aboard the Jijamata Express heading towards Bombay. But this isn't any ordinary train journey—something feels peculiarly different. The train travels faster than usual, and the landscape outside doesn't match his memories. As he converses with a fellow passenger named Khan Sahib, subtle clues emerge that hint at a world vastly unlike the one he knows.
The professor's confusion deepens when the train halts at a small station called Sarhad, where officials check permits. Khan Sahib casually mentions that they're entering British territory. This strikes Gangadharpant as peculiar—after all, India gained independence decades ago, didn't it? Yet here he is, apparently in a nation still under British rule.
A Bombay That Never Was
Upon reaching Victoria Terminus (now called Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus in our reality), Professor Gaitonde steps into a Bombay that simultaneously feels familiar and utterly alien. The most shocking sight greets him immediately: the imposing headquarters of the East India Company, an organisation that should have been dissolved after 1857. British banks line the streets—Lloyds, Barclays—alongside shops like Boots and Woolworth, giving the city the appearance of an English high street rather than an Indian metropolis.
Desperate for answers, the professor visits Forbes building hoping to find his son, Vinay Gaitonde. The receptionist searches thoroughly but reports that no one by that name works there—or anywhere in their branches. A chilling realisation dawns on Gangadharpant: if he doesn't exist in this world, why would his son? Perhaps Vinay was never even born in this strange reality.
The Library Revelation
Driven by his historian's instinct, Professor Gaitonde makes his way to the Town Hall library, home to the Asiatic Society's extensive collection. He requests his own five-volume history series, determined to understand where this world diverged from the one he remembers. Methodically, he reads through the volumes: ancient India under Ashoka, the Gupta period under Samudragupta, mediaeval times under Mohammad Ghori, and the Mughal era ending with Aurangzeb's death. Everything matches his knowledge perfectly—until he reaches the fifth volume.
There, on pages describing the Third Battle of Panipat (1761), he discovers the pivotal difference. In this world's history, the Marathas won decisively! Young Vishwasrao, who died in the actual battle, survived when a bullet merely grazed his ear. This seemingly tiny detail—the width of a sesame seed—changed everything. The Maratha victory prevented British colonial expansion, allowing India to develop independently whilst maintaining its self-respect and dignity.
In this alternate history, the Marathas established dominance over India, confining the British to small trading posts. The country modernised on its own terms, embracing science and technology without suffering colonial subjugation. Democracy eventually replaced the Peshwa rule, but India retained its sovereignty—only permitting Britain to lease Bombay as a commercial outpost until 2001.
The Azad Maidan Incident
After a day of research, Professor Gaitonde inadvertently pockets a historical text called 'Bhausahebanchi Bakhar' as he leaves the library. That evening, whilst strolling through Azad Maidan, he notices a lecture in progress. However, something strikes him as deeply wrong: the presidential chair sits empty! For someone who has presided over 999 meetings, this absence of a chairperson seems like a sacrilege.
Unable to restrain himself, Gangadharpant rushes to occupy the vacant chair, determined to restore proper decorum. He attempts to address the audience, declaring that a lecture without a chairperson is like Shakespeare's Hamlet without the Prince of Denmark. The crowd, however, doesn't share his views. They pelt him with tomatoes and eggs, shouting that they've abolished such outdated customs. As the angry mob swarms the stage to remove him forcibly, Professor Gaitonde mysteriously vanishes.
Back to Reality—Or Is It?
The professor awakens to find himself in familiar surroundings—his own world, where India experienced British colonisation and eventually gained independence. He had been missing for two days following a collision with a lorry in Pune. Now, back in his friend Rajendra Deshpande's home, he recounts his extraordinary experience. To prove he isn't delusional, Gangadharpant produces a torn page from the Bakhar he'd borrowed in the other world—a page describing Vishwasrao's narrow escape from death.
The Scientific Explanation
Rajendra Deshpande, initially sceptical, becomes intrigued by this physical evidence. He offers a fascinating explanation grounded in two scientific theories: catastrophe theory and quantum mechanics. Catastrophe theory, he explains, deals with situations where tiny changes lead to dramatically different outcomes—like the Battle of Panipat, where Vishwasrao's survival or death created a bifurcation point in history.
But how could Professor Gaitonde experience an alternate reality? Rajendra turns to quantum theory, which suggests that reality isn't singular. At the subatomic level, particles exist in multiple states simultaneously until observed. Scientists have proposed the 'many-worlds interpretation'—the idea that all possible alternative histories actually exist in parallel universes. Normally, we're confined to experiencing just one reality. However, Rajendra theorises that during the accident, whilst Professor Gaitonde was contemplating catastrophe theory and the Battle of Panipat, something triggered a transition between worlds. Perhaps the neurons in his brain, combined with his intense focus on historical possibilities, acted as a catalyst.
According to this interpretation, Gangadharpant didn't travel through time—past or future. Rather, he experienced a different present, one where history had branched differently at a critical juncture. He witnessed what India might have become had a single bullet trajectory changed by a fraction of an inch.
The Professor's Resolution
The experience profoundly affects Professor Gaitonde. He was scheduled to deliver his thousandth presidential address at a seminar about the Battle of Panipat, where he would have speculated about alternative historical outcomes. However, he now believes he already gave that thousandth address—on the stage at Azad Maidan in the parallel world, even though he was rudely interrupted. The Professor who zealously defended the tradition of presiding over meetings has decided never to occupy a presidential chair again. He conveys his regrets to the seminar organisers, leaving us to wonder: Has his adventure changed him, or has experiencing an alternate reality made him question the conventions he once held sacred?
Key Takeaway: "The Adventure" brilliantly merges science and imagination to explore profound questions about reality, history, and human perception. It reminds us that the world we live in is shaped by countless small moments, and that reality itself might be more complex and mysterious than we typically assume.
Textbook Questions and Answers
Understanding the Text
I. Tick the statements that are true:
1. The story is an account of real events.
False. This is a work of fiction that combines scientific theories with imaginative storytelling. The events described never actually occurred.
2. The story hinges on a particular historical event.
True. The entire narrative pivots on the Third Battle of Panipat (1761), specifically whether Vishwasrao survived or died during the battle.
3. Rajendra Deshpande was a historian.
False. Rajendra Deshpande is described as a scientist who explains the experience using catastrophe theory and quantum mechanics, not as a historian.
4. The places mentioned in the story are all imaginary.
False. The story mentions real locations such as Pune, Bombay (Mumbai), Victoria Terminus, Azad Maidan, and the Town Hall. These are actual places, though the story presents an alternate version of them.
5. The story tries to relate history to science.
True. One of the central themes is connecting historical events with scientific concepts like catastrophe theory and quantum mechanics to explain parallel realities.
II. Briefly explain the following statements from the text:
1. "You neither travelled to the past nor the future. You were in the present experiencing a different world."
Rajendra explains that Professor Gaitonde didn't move through time in any direction. Instead, he experienced an alternate present—a parallel reality where history had unfolded differently after the Battle of Panipat. The date and time period remained the same; only the historical circumstances differed. This concept draws from quantum theory's suggestion that multiple versions of reality can exist simultaneously.
2. "You have passed through a fantastic experience: or more correctly, a catastrophic experience."
Rajendra uses "catastrophic" in its scientific sense, referring to catastrophe theory. A catastrophe in this context means a sudden, dramatic change caused by a small variation in circumstances. Professor Gaitonde's experience was catastrophic because he witnessed reality split at a crucial historical juncture—a pivotal moment where tiny differences created vastly divergent outcomes.
3. "Gangadharpant could not help comparing the country he knew with what he was witnessing around him."
As a historian, Professor Gaitonde instinctively analysed the differences between the two Indias. The alternate India he observed had never suffered colonial subjugation and had developed with dignity and self-respect. It had modernised independently, embraced technology on its own terms, and transitioned to democracy without the trauma of colonial rule. This comparison was both fascinating and somewhat painful for him.
4. "The lack of determinism in quantum theory!"
In classical physics, if you know all the variables, you can predict exactly what will happen. However, quantum theory reveals that at the subatomic level, we can only calculate probabilities, not certainties. An electron's exact position cannot be determined—only the likelihood of finding it in various locations. This "lack of determinism" means the universe isn't as predictable as we once believed, opening possibilities for multiple realities to coexist.
5. "You need some interaction to cause a transition."
Rajendra suggests that moving between parallel realities requires a trigger—some form of interaction or catalyst. In Professor Gaitonde's case, the collision with the lorry, combined with his deep contemplation of catastrophe theory and the Battle of Panipat, may have provided that trigger. The neurons in his brain, processing these historical possibilities at the moment of impact, might have facilitated his transition between worlds.
Talking About the Text
Discussion Topics:
(i) A single event may change the course of the history of a nation.
For the statement: History provides numerous examples where pivotal moments determined nations' futures. Consider how Archduke Franz Ferdinand's assassination triggered World War I, reshaping the entire world. In India's context, if the Battle of Panipat had ended differently, British colonisation might never have occurred. Small decisions by leaders, unexpected deaths, narrow escapes—these moments create ripples across time that become tsunamis of change.
Against the statement: However, one could argue that historical forces involve complex interactions of economics, geography, culture, and countless individual actions. No single event operates in isolation. Even if Vishwasrao had survived Panipat, other factors might have still led to British expansion. History isn't determined by isolated moments but by broader patterns and systemic forces that transcend individual events.
(ii) Reality is what is directly experienced through the senses.
For the statement: Our senses provide the primary means of understanding our environment. What we see, hear, touch, taste, and smell forms our experiential reality. Without sensory input, we cannot confirm anything exists. This empirical approach underlies scientific methodology—observation and measurement through our senses (or instruments that extend them) constitute our understanding of what's real.
Against the statement: Yet our senses can deceive us. Optical illusions, dreams that feel real, and neurological conditions demonstrate that sensory experience doesn't always reflect objective truth. Quantum physics reveals realities that exist beyond direct sensory perception. Professor Gaitonde's experience challenges the notion that reality is singular and directly observable. Perhaps multiple realities exist simultaneously, even if we typically perceive only one.
(iii) Why do you think Professor Gaitonde decided never to preside over meetings again?
Professor Gaitonde's decision reflects profound personal transformation. His humiliating experience in the parallel world—being pelted with tomatoes and ejected from the stage—made him reconsider traditions he'd always taken for granted. He'd presided over 999 meetings, viewing the chairperson's role as essential. However, in the alternate reality, society had moved beyond such formalities, finding them unnecessary and pretentious. This experience shattered his certainty about conventions he'd considered sacred. Additionally, he believes he already delivered his thousandth presidential address at Azad Maidan, even though it ended chaotically. The entire experience humbled him, making him question whether the rituals and ceremonies he'd championed were truly important or merely empty traditions perpetuated by habit rather than genuine value.
Thinking About Language
1. In which language do you think Gangadharpant and Khan Sahib talked to each other? Which language did Gangadharpant use to talk to the English receptionist?
Gangadharpant and Khan Sahib likely conversed in Hindustani (a blend of Hindi and Urdu), which served as a common language across North India for inter-community communication. Alternatively, they might have used English, which functioned as a lingua franca during British rule. When speaking to the English receptionist, Gangadharpant would have used English, as she represented the British establishment in that parallel world.
2. In which language do you think Bhausahebanchi Bakhar was written?
The Bakhar would have been written in Marathi. Bakhars were traditional Marathi historical chronicles documenting events, particularly those related to Maratha history and the Peshwa period. The title itself is Marathi, suggesting this historical account was intended for Marathi-speaking readers.
3. Which languages did the three communities (Marathas, Mughals, Anglo-Indians) use within their communities and whilst speaking to other groups?
Within their own communities: Marathas spoke Marathi, Mughals used Urdu or Persian, and Anglo-Indians used English. When communicating across communities, they likely relied on Hindustani or English. In administrative and commercial contexts, Persian served as the court language during Mughal times, gradually replaced by English under British influence. This multilingual reality reflects India's rich linguistic diversity and the pragmatic need for common languages in multicultural interactions.
4. Do you think that the ruled always adopt the language of the ruler?
Not necessarily, though colonial and imperial powers often impose their languages. In India, English became essential for administration, education, and social mobility during British rule, and it continues as an important language today. However, regional languages survived and thrived despite colonial pressure. People adopted the ruler's language for practical advantages whilst maintaining their native tongues for cultural identity and daily life. The relationship between political power and linguistic dominance is complex—influenced by factors like education policy, economic opportunities, cultural resistance, and the duration of rule.
Working with Words
I. Meanings of Phrases:
1. to take issue with – (iii) to disagree
2. to give vent to – (i) to express
3. to stand on one's feet – (ii) to be independent
4. to be wound up – (ii) to stop operating
5. to meet one's match – (iii) to meet someone who is equally able as oneself
II. Distinguishing Between Word Forms:
1. (i) He was visibly moved. – Means he showed obvious emotional response that could be seen.
(ii) He was visually impaired. – Means he had difficulties with sight or vision.
2. (i) Green and black stripes were used alternately. – Means the stripes took turns in a regular pattern (green, black, green, black).
(ii) Green stripes could be used or alternatively black ones. – Means there's a choice between green or black, presenting options.
3. (i) The team played the two matches successfully. – Means they won or performed well in both matches.
(ii) The team played two matches successively. – Means they played the matches one after another in sequence, regardless of outcome.
4. (i) The librarian spoke respectfully to the learned scholar. – Means she spoke with respect and courtesy.
(ii) The historian and scientist are in the archaeology and natural science sections respectively. – Means each is in their corresponding section (historian in archaeology, scientist in natural science).
Important Exam Questions
These questions are frequently asked in CBSE examinations. Prepare them thoroughly for excellent results!
Very Short Answer Questions (VSA) – 1-2 Marks
Q1. Who is the author of "The Adventure"?
Answer: Jayant Narlikar, a distinguished Indian astrophysicist and writer, authored "The Adventure."
Q2. What was Professor Gaitonde's profession?
Answer: Professor Gangadharpant Gaitonde was a historian who had authored a five-volume history series and presided over 999 public meetings.
Q3. Which historical battle is central to the story?
Answer: The Third Battle of Panipat (1761) between the Marathas and Ahmad Shah Abdali forms the pivotal historical event around which the story revolves.
Q4. What triggered Professor Gaitonde's transition between worlds?
Answer: According to Rajendra's theory, the collision with a lorry, combined with Professor Gaitonde's intense contemplation of catastrophe theory and the Battle of Panipat, triggered the transition between parallel realities.
Short Answer Questions (SA) – 3-4 Marks
Q5. How was the Bombay that Professor Gaitonde visited different from the one he knew?
Answer: The Bombay Professor Gaitonde encountered was strikingly different in several ways. Firstly, it remained under British control, with permits required to enter the territory. The East India Company, which had been dissolved after 1857 in actual history, still functioned as a thriving organisation with an imposing headquarters. British establishments like Boots, Woolworth, Lloyds, and Barclays dominated the commercial landscape, making it resemble an English town rather than an Indian city. The railway carriages displayed Union Jacks, serving as constant reminders of British sovereignty. Most significantly, this Bombay existed in an India that had never experienced full colonial subjugation, having retained its independence following the Maratha victory at Panipat.
Q6. What evidence did Professor Gaitonde provide to prove his experience was real?
Answer: Professor Gaitonde produced a torn page from 'Bhausahebanchi Bakhar,' a historical text he had inadvertently pocketed whilst in the alternate reality. This page contained a crucial account describing how Vishwasrao narrowly escaped death when a bullet merely grazed his ear—an event that boosted Maratha morale and led to victory. When Rajendra compared this with the same Bakhar from their own reality, the text differed significantly. In their world's version, the account stated that Vishwasrao was struck and killed by the bullet. This physical evidence—a page that shouldn't exist in their reality—convinced Rajendra that Professor Gaitonde's experience might be genuine rather than mere fantasy or imagination.
Q7. Explain catastrophe theory as applied to the Battle of Panipat.
Answer: Catastrophe theory examines situations where minute changes in circumstances produce dramatically different outcomes. Rajendra applied this to the Battle of Panipat by explaining that the two armies were fairly evenly matched in numbers and equipment. Victory depended significantly on leadership and troop morale. The critical moment occurred when Vishwasrao charged into battle. In actual history, he was killed, demoralising the Maratha forces and leading to their defeat. His uncle Bhausaheb rushed to help and disappeared, compounding the disaster. However, a change as tiny as the trajectory of a single bullet—the width of a sesame seed—could have altered everything. Had Vishwasrao survived, Maratha morale would have soared instead of collapsing, potentially turning defeat into victory. This exemplifies how catastrophic situations create bifurcation points where history splits into radically different paths based on seemingly insignificant variations.
Long Answer Questions (LA) – 5-6 Marks
Q8. How does Rajendra Deshpande explain Professor Gaitonde's experience using quantum theory?
Answer: Rajendra offers a fascinating explanation grounded in quantum mechanics and the many-worlds interpretation. He begins by distinguishing quantum behaviour from classical physics. In classical mechanics, if you fire a bullet knowing its direction and speed, you can precisely predict its location at any future time. However, quantum particles like electrons don't behave this way. An electron fired from a source could be anywhere—its position cannot be determined with certainty, only probabilistically.
This "lack of determinism" suggests that reality at the quantum level isn't singular. Physicists have proposed that all possible states exist simultaneously in different "worlds" or realities. Once an observation is made, we become aware of which world we're in, but the others continue existing. Rajendra extends this concept from microscopic to macroscopic scales. Just as an electron might be in multiple locations across different realities, historical events might unfold differently across parallel worlds.
At catastrophic historical junctures—like the Battle of Panipat—reality bifurcates into multiple branches. In one world, Vishwasrao died and the Marathas lost; in another, he survived and the Marathas won. Normally, observers remain confined to one reality. However, Rajendra theorises that quantum transitions, whilst common at microscopic levels, might occasionally occur macroscopically. Professor Gaitonde experienced such a transition, moving from one present reality to another parallel present. He didn't time-travel; rather, he witnessed an alternative version of contemporary India that had developed from a different historical branch. The trigger for this extraordinary transition was likely the collision, combined with his brain's intense focus on historical possibilities—the neurons perhaps acting as a catalyst for what would normally be an impossible quantum leap between worlds.
Q9. Describe the alternate history of India as discovered by Professor Gaitonde in the library.
Answer: Professor Gaitonde's research in the Town Hall library revealed a fascinating alternate trajectory for Indian history. Reading through his own five-volume history series in this parallel world, he found that everything matched his knowledge up to the death of Aurangzeb. The divergence occurred at the Third Battle of Panipat in 1761.
In this alternate timeline, the Marathas achieved a decisive victory over Ahmad Shah Abdali. Young Vishwasrao survived when a bullet only grazed his ear—a difference of mere millimetres that changed everything. This narrow escape was interpreted as a divine omen, dramatically boosting Maratha morale and leading to their triumph. Abdali was routed and chased back to Kabul by the victorious Maratha forces led by Sadashivrao Bhau and Vishwasrao.
The consequences were profound. The victory established Maratha supremacy across northern India. The East India Company, which had been carefully observing these developments, temporarily abandoned its expansionist ambitions. Vishwasrao eventually succeeded his father as Peshwa in 1780, and together with his brother Madhavrao, he combined political wisdom with military prowess. The troublesome Dadasaheb was sidelined and retired from politics.
The British company found itself matched by these capable Maratha rulers and was confined to small trading posts near Bombay, Calcutta, and Madras—similar to their European competitors, the Portuguese and French. The Peshwas wisely maintained a puppet Mughal regime in Delhi for political convenience. Crucially, they recognised the importance of emerging European technology and established their own scientific and technological centres. When the East India Company offered aid and experts, the Marathas accepted only to make these centres self-sufficient, never becoming dependent.
By the twentieth century, democratic principles inspired by the West led to gradual replacement of Peshwa rule with elected bodies. The Sultanate in Delhi survived as a ceremonial figurehead. Most significantly, India in this timeline had never experienced colonial subjugation. It had maintained its self-respect, modernised on its own terms, and only permitted Britain to lease Bombay as a commercial outpost—a lease set to expire in 2001. This was an India that had "learnt to stand on its feet," developing strength and dignity without the trauma of colonisation.
Q10. What is the significance of the Azad Maidan incident in the story?
Answer: The Azad Maidan incident serves multiple crucial functions in the narrative. On a plot level, it represents the climax of Professor Gaitonde's experience in the parallel world and triggers his return to his original reality. On a thematic level, it reveals profound differences between the two worlds' social values and conventions.
Professor Gaitonde, having presided over 999 meetings, considered the chairperson's role essential to any public lecture—a sacred tradition that maintained decorum and dignity. When he saw the empty presidential chair at the lecture in Azad Maidan, he felt compelled to occupy it, viewing the absence of a presiding officer as a serious breach of protocol. His comparison to "Hamlet without the Prince of Denmark" reveals how fundamental he believed this tradition to be.
However, the audience's reaction was violently opposed to his intervention. They had deliberately abolished what they considered outdated customs—the lengthy introductions, votes of thanks, and pompous remarks from chairs that distracted from the actual content. This alternate society had moved beyond formalities that Professor Gaitonde's world still valued. Their hostility—pelting him with tomatoes and eggs before forcibly removing him—demonstrated their strong conviction that such traditions were unnecessary impediments to genuine discourse.
The incident is also significant as it provides the catalyst for Professor Gaitonde's return. His mysterious disappearance during the chaos suggests that the transition between worlds occurred at this moment of crisis and conflict. Additionally, this humiliating experience profoundly affected him psychologically. It shattered his certainty about conventions he had championed throughout his career, leading to his decision never to preside over meetings again. The incident thus represents both a physical transition point and a moment of personal transformation that permanently altered his perspective on tradition, authority, and the rituals he had once held sacred.
Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs)
Test your understanding with these carefully crafted MCQs. Each question is followed by the correct answer and explanation.
1. What was Professor Gaitonde contemplating at the time of his accident?
(a) Quantum mechanics
(b) The Battle of Waterloo
(c) Catastrophe theory and its implications for history
(d) His thousandth presidential address
Answer: (c) Catastrophe theory and its implications for history
Explanation: When Rajendra asked what he was doing just before the collision, Professor Gaitonde confirmed he was thinking about catastrophe theory and its implications for history, particularly wondering about alternative outcomes of historical battles. This mental focus likely acted as a trigger for his transition between worlds.
2. Which train was Professor Gaitonde travelling on?
(a) Deccan Queen
(b) Frontier Mail
(c) Jijamata Express
(d) Rajdhani Express
Answer: (c) Jijamata Express
Explanation: The story begins with Professor Gaitonde aboard the Jijamata Express travelling from Pune to Bombay. The narrative mentions that it was considerably faster than the Deccan Queen, which was his usual train in the real world.
3. What organisation's headquarters did Professor Gaitonde see in the alternate Bombay?
(a) British Parliament
(b) East India Company
(c) Maratha Empire
(d) Asiatic Society
Answer: (b) East India Company
Explanation: Upon emerging from Victoria Terminus, Professor Gaitonde was shocked to see the imposing headquarters of the East India Company—an organisation that had been dissolved after 1857 in actual history but remained flourishing in this alternate reality.
4. Whom was Professor Gaitonde trying to find at Forbes building?
(a) Rajendra Deshpande
(b) Khan Sahib
(c) Vinay Gaitonde
(d) Vishwasrao
Answer: (c) Vinay Gaitonde
Explanation: Professor Gaitonde went to Forbes building hoping to find his son, Vinay Gaitonde. However, the receptionist could not locate anyone by that name in any of their branches, leading to the realisation that his son might not exist in this alternate reality.
5. Where did Professor Gaitonde go to research the alternate history?
(a) British Museum
(b) Pune University Library
(c) Town Hall library of the Asiatic Society
(d) East India Company archives
Answer: (c) Town Hall library of the Asiatic Society
Explanation: Following his historian's instincts, Professor Gaitonde made his way to the Town Hall, which housed the library of the Asiatic Society. There he requested his own five-volume history series to understand how this alternate reality had developed.
6. What crucial difference did Professor Gaitonde discover about the Battle of Panipat?
(a) The battle never occurred
(b) The Marathas won decisively
(c) The British participated in the battle
(d) The battle was fought in Delhi
Answer: (b) The Marathas won decisively
Explanation: In the fifth volume of his history series, Professor Gaitonde discovered that in this alternate reality, the Marathas had won the Third Battle of Panipat handsomely. Abdali was routed and chased back to Kabul, completely reversing the outcome of actual history.
7. What happened to Vishwasrao in the alternate reality's Battle of Panipat?
(a) He was killed by a bullet
(b) A bullet grazed his ear but he survived
(c) He never participated in the battle
(d) He captured Abdali personally
Answer: (b) A bullet grazed his ear but he survived
Explanation: The Bakhar in the alternate reality described how Vishwasrao narrowly escaped death—a shot merely brushed past his ear. The account mentioned that even a difference of a 'til' (sesame seed width) would have led to his death. His survival was interpreted as divine favour and boosted Maratha morale dramatically.
8. What book did Professor Gaitonde inadvertently pocket from the library?
(a) His own five-volume history series
(b) Bhausahebanchi Bakhar
(c) A quantum physics textbook
(d) A guide to Bombay
Answer: (b) Bhausahebanchi Bakhar
Explanation: As Professor Gaitonde left the library, he absent-mindedly slipped the Bhausahebanchi Bakhar into his pocket. He discovered this error when paying for his meal and intended to return it the next morning. However, in the chaos at Azad Maidan, the book was lost, though a crucial torn page remained as evidence.
9. Why did Professor Gaitonde rush to occupy the chair at Azad Maidan?
(a) He was invited to preside
(b) He wanted to deliver his lecture
(c) He felt a lecture without a chairperson was improper
(d) He was escaping from the library
Answer: (c) He felt a lecture without a chairperson was improper
Explanation: Having presided over 999 meetings, Professor Gaitonde considered an empty presidential chair a serious breach of decorum. He felt compelled to correct what he viewed as a sacrilege, comparing an unchaired lecture to "Hamlet without the Prince of Denmark."
10. How did the audience at Azad Maidan react to Professor Gaitonde's attempt to preside?
(a) They welcomed him warmly
(b) They ignored him completely
(c) They pelted him with tomatoes and eggs
(d) They invited him to speak
Answer: (c) They pelted him with tomatoes and eggs
Explanation: The audience was hostile to Professor Gaitonde's intervention, pelting him with tomatoes, eggs, and other objects. They explained that they had abolished old customs like chairpersons, introductions, and votes of thanks, wanting only to hear the actual speaker.
11. Who provided the scientific explanation for Professor Gaitonde's experience?
(a) Khan Sahib
(b) Vinay Gaitonde
(c) Rajendra Deshpande
(d) The librarian
Answer: (c) Rajendra Deshpande
Explanation: Rajendra Deshpande, Professor Gaitonde's friend and a scientist, provided the explanation using catastrophe theory and quantum mechanics. Initially sceptical, he became convinced after seeing the physical evidence of the torn page from the Bakhar.
12. According to Rajendra, what does the "lack of determinism in quantum theory" mean?
(a) Quantum particles behave randomly with no laws
(b) The exact position of quantum particles cannot be determined with certainty
(c) Quantum theory has been disproved
(d) History cannot be studied scientifically
Answer: (b) The exact position of quantum particles cannot be determined with certainty
Explanation: Rajendra explained that unlike a bullet whose trajectory can be precisely predicted, an electron's exact location cannot be determined definitively. We can only calculate the probability of finding it in various positions. This fundamental unpredictability at the quantum level challenges our notion of a single, predetermined reality.
13. How many meetings had Professor Gaitonde presided over before this incident?
(a) 99
(b) 999
(c) 1000
(d) 500
Answer: (b) 999
Explanation: Professor Gaitonde had presided over exactly 999 meetings and was scheduled to deliver his thousandth presidential address at the Panipat seminar. However, after his experience, he considered the interrupted speech at Azad Maidan as his thousandth address and decided never to preside again.
14. What decision did Professor Gaitonde make after returning to his original reality?
(a) To write about his experience
(b) To never preside over meetings again
(c) To return to the parallel world
(d) To study quantum physics
Answer: (b) To never preside over meetings again
Explanation: The experience profoundly changed Professor Gaitonde. He believed he had already delivered his thousandth presidential address at Azad Maidan, and the humiliation he suffered there made him question traditions he had always upheld. He conveyed his regrets to the Panipat seminar organisers, resolving never to preside over another meeting.
15. What is the main theme of "The Adventure"?
(a) The importance of historical research
(b) How small historical events can create alternate realities
(c) The dangers of train travel
(d) The conflict between tradition and modernity
Answer: (b) How small historical events can create alternate realities
Explanation: Whilst the story touches on several themes, its central focus is exploring how catastrophic historical moments create bifurcation points where reality splits into multiple paths. A tiny change—a bullet's trajectory differing by millimetres—produces entirely different worlds. The story brilliantly connects this historical speculation with quantum theory's many-worlds interpretation, suggesting that all these alternate realities might actually exist simultaneously.
No comments:
Post a Comment